Let's debunk a myth that the titans of financial distribution, like Quilter's CEO Stephen Levin, would have us believe. They propagate the idea that the UK market is desperately in need of large financial distributors, painting a picture of a clueless public lost without their guidance. But the truth is, this narrative is as false as it is self-serving.
From my experience, clients are far from the uninformed masses that these CEOs claim they are. Quite the opposite, in fact. Thanks to the rise of financial influencers (or "finfluencers") and the wealth of information available online, people are more financially savvy than ever. They don't need someone to run their money for them; they simply need a second opinion to validate their conclusions.
In reality, 90% of the time, 90% of people can manage their finances perfectly well with the right support—tools, educational resources, and robust Q&A systems. These resources can be delivered at a fraction of the cost of traditional channels through scalable models like one-to-many or DIY financial planning. In times of stress or major life changes, yes, more personalised, one-to-one advice may be necessary, but this is the exception rather than the rule.
CEOs like Levin would have you believe that the British public is in dire need of hand-holding through every financial decision. They argue that there is a gaping "advice gap" in the UK and that too few advisers are available, making access to advice difficult. This couldn't be further from the truth. The real issue isn't a lack of financial understanding; it's economic circumstances and the order in which financial stability must be built. People need to focus on building human capital, leveraging entrepreneurial opportunities, creating sustainable livelihoods, and securing income before they even think about investing.
Financial advisers, in their current form, are merely salespeople. They are incentivised to push products rather than provide unbiased advice. This is a critical distinction that the CEOs conveniently ignore. Their version of financial education is skewed towards pushing products, not solving actual financial problems.
The so-called "advice gap" is a smokescreen for a more significant issue: a wealth divide.
Financial advisers are not interested in those without surplus funds because, quite simply, there's no money to be made. They set high thresholds for new clients, and once their books are full, they focus on extracting as much value as possible from existing clients.
This is why many people find it difficult to access these services—it's not about a shortage of advisers, but rather about advisers prioritising those with deep pockets.
Furthermore, the notion that Britons are sitting on cash due to a lack of knowledge is another misleading narrative. People are cautious and prefer savings over investments in a volatile market—an entirely rational approach. The industry’s leaders, however, see this caution as an opportunity to scare people into taking unnecessary risks for their own financial gain.
Let's also address the influence these CEOs have on policy-making. The advice guidance review by the FCA regulator, heavily lobbied for by these financial giants, is designed to ease compliance checks, allowing large firms to sell more products without the risk of redress for misselling. This isn't about providing better advice; it's about increasing sales under the guise of guidance.
In conclusion, the British public is more financially literate and capable than the financial giants would have you believe. The real barriers to financial independence are economic, not educational. It's time to see through the lies of these CEOs and recognise that with the right tools and support, most people can—and should—manage their own finances. The need for a vast army of financial advisers is a myth perpetuated by those who stand to profit from it. Let's empower individuals to take control of their financial destinies, free from the self-serving advice of the financial industry elite.
Q&A: Unmasking the Myths of Financial Advising
Q: Why do CEOs of large financial distributors insist that Britons need financial advisers?
A: Oh, it's simple! They need to justify their oversized paycheques and maintain the illusion that the public is helpless without them. They spin tales about financial illiteracy to keep their empire thriving. If everyone knew how easy it is to manage their own money, those CEOs might actually have to find honest work.
Q: Is it true that there’s a significant "advice gap" in the UK?
A: "Advice gap"? More like a gap in the CEOs' logic. The real issue isn't the lack of advisers but rather the lack of surplus funds among the public. Advisers aren't exactly lining up to help people with no money to invest. They prefer clients with deep pockets—more commission (sorry, ongoing advice charges) that way.
Q: Are Britons really that financially clueless?
A: Far from it. The average person today is pretty clued up, thanks to the internet and finfluencers. They can Google, watch YouTube, and join forums to get all the financial education they need. All they occasionally need is a second opinion, not a hand-holding session with a product pusher.
Q: Why do financial advisers set high thresholds for new clients?
A: Because they’re not interested in anyone who doesn’t have a big enough pot of gold. They’re in it for the commissions, not out of the goodness of their hearts. High thresholds ensure they only deal with the wealthy, leaving the rest to fend for themselves.
Q: Are financial advisers really just salespeople?
A: Bingo! They’re incentivised to sell products, not provide unbiased advice. Their "advice" usually comes with a side of sales pitch, because that’s where their bread is buttered. Remember, they’re not called "financial salespeople" for nothing.
Q: Why do financial CEOs push for less regulation?
A: Less regulation means more freedom to sell, sell, sell without pesky compliance checks. It's a dream come true for CEOs wanting to push their products onto unsuspecting customers without the risk of getting slapped for misselling.
Q: Is holding cash really such a bad idea?
A: According to the CEOs, it’s the worst sin imaginable. But in reality, people are being cautious—a smart move given market volatility. The bigwigs just want your cash in their investments so they can skim off the top, risk be damned. And, yes, I do understand performance assets and the need for long-term return. Stop spinning the yarn!
Q: What’s the real reason behind the 7.4 million unsuccessful client contacts?
A: Advisers ghost potential clients who don’t have a sniff of extra assets. They won’t waste their time on anyone who doesn’t promise a hefty commission. The unsuccessful contacts are simply the masses who don’t meet the advisers’ rich-only criteria.
Q: Do people really need more financial education?
A: What they need is better economic circumstances, not a crash course in buying investment products. Education is important, but the real barrier is lack of disposable income. No amount of education will fill an empty pocket.
Q: How do you propose people handle their finances?
A: Empower them with the right tools, educational resources, and support. Most people can manage just fine on their own. Let’s stop perpetuating the myth that they need an adviser to hold their hand. It’s time to trust in the public’s capability to take control of their own financial destiny.
Comments