The economic relationship between drivers of well-being is foundational to understanding and enhancing the prosperity of a nation. These drivers include income, expenditure, assets, and liabilities. For any government aiming to improve the well-being of its citizens, it is crucial to focus on these areas systematically:
Income: Identifying and leveraging the productive assets of citizens through sustainable livelihoods is essential for creating and maintaining long-term economic vitality. This involves investing in human capital development to ensure that economic activity has the longevity and resilience needed for sustained growth.
Expenditure: Reducing the cost of living while promoting an empowered lifestyle should be a priority. Making essential goods and services accessible and affordable for all can significantly enhance the quality of life and economic stability.
Assets: Governments must create safe, fair, transparent, and low-cost financial asset opportunities. Such initiatives encourage savings and investments, providing citizens with secure avenues to grow their wealth.
Liabilities: Affordable, accessible, and manageable lending options should be available to citizens, enabling them to borrow against the present value of their future earnings. This can help mitigate financial stress and promote economic mobility.
However, current legislation often falls short of these goals due to the influence of lobbyist groups like PIMFA. While PIMFA's articles claim to support the public interest, their actions frequently favour the commercial interests of their members. To truly promote the best interests of its members, PIMFA must prioritise the end-client's best interests on an equal footing.
PIMFA's recent call for government focus on retail investors highlights this disparity. They advocate for policies encouraging the squeezed middle class to consume less and save more, without addressing the crucial issue of earnings development. While savings can indeed be beneficial to the economy, so can consumption, particularly when it supports immediate needs and economic participation.
What we need is a level playing field in lobbying efforts, where representatives of revenue-poor consumers have an equal voice alongside the financially robust asset management industry. It is unjust to further deplete the resources of those already struggling; instead, policy must first focus on filling pockets, raising consumption levels from poverty to a comfortable and empowered standard of living.
Once basic economic stability is achieved, the focus should shift to reducing debt and ensuring that revenue streams are sustainable through adverse health and life events. Only after these needs are met should long-term savings and investments become a priority.
There is a compelling case for neutral voices to be heard—voices representing citizens committed to eradicating poverty and fostering sustainable well-being. These advocates should be integral to shaping policies that genuinely reflect the interests of the public, rather than the narrow agendas of financially powerful groups.
In summary, a balanced approach to wealth creation requires comprehensive strategies that address income, expenditure, assets, and liabilities in a manner that promotes overall well-being. By prioritising human capital development, reducing living costs, creating fair financial opportunities, and ensuring accessible lending, governments can foster a more inclusive and sustainable economic environment. Only through such holistic measures can we achieve a truly thriving and equitable society.
תגובות